絞り込み

16645

広告

新型ウイルス肺炎 北朝鮮国営航空 外国人観光客は乗せない対応

中国で新型のコロナウイルスによるものとみられる肺炎への感染が広がっている問題を受けた北朝鮮の動きです。北朝鮮国営のコリョ(高麗)航空はNHKの取材に対し、北京か...

  1. 新型ウイルス肺炎 マカオでも感染者を初確...
  2. 調達情報 中小企業のための女性活躍推進事...
  3. 調達情報 民間人材サービスの活用検討事業...
  4. 書店水槽に「ぴろぴろの何か」 絶滅危惧ド...

ニュース一覧

Vena Cava Filters and In-Hospital Case Fatality Among Patients With Pulmonary Embolism: Results From a Large Population-Based Study.

著者 Pomero F , Ageno W , Dentali F , Fenoglio L , Squizzato A , Bonzini M
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost.2019 Jan-Dec ; 25():1076029619888022.
この記事をPubMed上で見るPubMedで表示
この記事をGoogle翻訳上で見る Google翻訳で開く

スターを付ける スターを付ける     (17view , 0users)

Full Text Sources

In patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE), vena cava filters (VCFs) are currently only recommended when anticoagulant treatment is contraindicated or if VTE has recurred despite adequate anticoagulation. However, evidence on the efficacy of filter in patients with VTE is not compelling. We evaluated potential efficacy of VCF in reducing in-hospital mortality in a large population of patients presenting with a first episode of pulmonary embolism (PE). Patients were collected using regional hospital-discharge databases covering a population of more than 13 million of inhabitants in Northern Italy. For each year of observation, we calculated the proportion of cases with VCF among all PE incident cases. The temporal trend of VCF application during the study period was also derived. The effect of VCF use on in-hospital case-fatality rate was evaluated with a multivariate regression model and with the use of propensity score matching. During the study period (2002-2012), 60 813 patients were hospitalized for a first episode of acute PE. In-hospital case-fatality rate for PE was 13.3%. Vena cava filters were used in 745 (1.22%) patients. The annual use of VCF remained stable from 2002 to 2008, while it progressively decreased afterward. After adjustment for available confounders, case-fatality rate remained significantly lower in patients who received VCF compared to the one registered in patients who did not (odds ratio [OR] 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.34-0.62). Propensity score matching gave similar results (OR: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.30-0.61). Vena cava filters were infrequently used in patients with acute PE. Insertion of VCF appeared to sensibly reduce all-cause in-hospital mortality in this subgroup of patients.
PMID: 31746216 [PubMed - in process]
印刷用ページを開く Endnote用テキストダウンロード