Background: In a previously reported randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study of the efficacy and tolerability of olmesartan medoxomil (OLM) and azelnidipine (AZL) combination therapy compared with monotherapy with each agent in Japanese patients with essential hypertension (the REZALT study), the use of a combination of OLM, an angiotensin II receptor blocker, plus AZL, a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, was associated with significantly greater reductions in office sitting blood pressure (BP) and 24-hour ambulatory BP compared with monotherapy with either agent, and was well tolerated. Objective: This article reports the results from an a priori planned analysis and post hoc analyses of the diurnal BP and pulse rate (PR) profiles of OLM/AZL versus monotherapy with either agent from the REZALT study. Methods: Male and female Japanese outpatients with essential hypertension were eligible if they met the following inclusion criteria: age >/=20 years; systolic BP (SBP) >/=140 to <180 mm Hg and diastolic BP (DBP) >/=90 to <110 mm Hg; and 24-hour ambulatory SBP/ DBP >/=135/>/=80 mm Hg. Patients were randomly assigned to receive OLM/AZL 10/8 mg, OLM/AZL 20/16 mg, OLM 20 mg, or AZL 16 mg, once daily for 12 weeks. The effectiveness of the treatments was assessed using 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) and PR, analyzed by time period (BP and PR, 24 hours, daytime [7 AM-<10 PM], nighttime [10 PM-<7 AM], and early morning [6 AM-<9 AM]; PR, morning [6 AM -<11 AM]) and dipping status at baseline (dippers [(Daytime BP - Nighttime BP)/Daytime BP >/=10%] or nondippers [(Daytime BP - Nighttime BP)/Daytime BP <10%]). Results: A total of 867 patients were enrolled, and 862 randomized patients were included in the full analysis set (590 men, 272 women; mean age, 56.6 years). A total of 839 patients had assessable ABPM data (213, 211, 206, and 209 patients in the OLM/AZL 10/8 mg, OLM/AZL 20/16 mg, OLM, and AZL groups, respectively). No clinically significant between-group differences were observed in baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. Combination therapy was associated with significantly greater antihypertensive effects on 24-hour ABPM compared with either monotherapy in all of the time periods, as follows: SBP/DBP reductions with OLM/AZL 20/16 mg in the daytime, nighttime, and early morning were -22.6/-14.1, -21.2/-12.5, and -20.6/-11.9 mm Hg, respectively (all, P < 0.05 vs the other 3 treatment groups). The SBP/DBP reductions with OLM/AZL 10/8 mg (daytime, -18.2/-11.0 mm Hg; nighttime, -18.1/-10.0 mm Hg; and early morning, -15.6/-9.3 mm Hg) were also significantly greater than with OLM 20 mg (-11.8/-6.7, -12.8/-7.2, and -11.0/ -6.9 mm Hg, respectively; all, P < 0.01) and AZL 16 mg (-13.1/-7.8, -10.2/-5.5, and -9.9/-6.1 mm Hg; all, P < 0.001) in all of the time periods. The antihypertensive effects associated with OLM/AZL 10/8 mg or 20/16 mg were significantly greater than those with monotherapies regardless of dipping pattern at baseline (all, P < 0.05) in all of the time periods, with the exception of nighttime reduction with OLM/AZL 10/8 mg versus OLM in dippers. The numbers of patients who had any increase in BP were 12/213 (5.6%) with OLM/AZL 10/8 mg, 13/211 (6.2%) with OLM/AZL 20/16 mg, 35/206 (17.0%) with OLM, and 36/209 (17.2%) with AZL. The AZL-containing regimens were associated with reduced morning PR (mean [95% CI] changes from baseline to week 12: -1.5 beats/min [-2.5 to -0.4] with OLM/AZL 10/8 mg, -2.1 beats/min [-3.0 to -1.1] with OLM/AZL 20/16 mg, 0.4 beat/min [-0.5 to 1.3] with OLM, and -1.9 beats/min [-2.8 to -1.0] with AZL). Conclusion: In this study in Japanese patients with essential hypertension, the reductions in daytime, nighttime, and early-morning BP assessed using 24-hour ABPM were significantly greater with combination OLM/AZL than with either monotherapy, regardless of dipping pattern at baseline. Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center registration number: JapicCTl-060286.

Numerous clinical trials have shown that calcium channel blocker (CCB) therapy improves the clinical outcome in patients with cardiovascular diseases. Since the progression of several types of cardiovascular diseases is closely associated with inflammation, alleviation of inflammation may be one potential mechanism of those beneficial effects of CCB therapy. We examined whether a new CCB (azelnidipine) could influence the inflammatory response of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), which are recruited to inflammatory lesions and modulate inflammation. We investigated whether azelnidipine affected intracellular signaling and cytokine production by phytohemagglutinin (PHA)-stimulated human PBMCs in vitro. PBMCs were obtained from 10 healthy volunteers and stimulated with PHA. Then relative intracellular calcium ion concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)) was assessed by fluorescence microscopy, and the production of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Stimulation with PHA significantly raised [Ca(2+)](i) and enhanced the production of MCP-1 and TNF-alpha by human PBMCs. Azelnidipine significantly diminished the PHA-induced rise of [Ca(2+)](i), and the production of MCP-1 and TNF-alpha. These findings indicate that azelnidipine might have an anti-inflammatory influence on human PBMCs, although the mechanisms and the difference from other CCBs still remain unclear and further exploration should be required.

A high performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method was established for the enantiomeric separation of azelnidipine. Baseline chiral separation of azelnidipine was achieved under normal-phase chromatographic mode using the Chiralpak AD-H chiral column (250 mm x 4.6 mm, 5.0 microm, Daicel). The influences of the nature of chiral stationary phase, form of the mobile phase, and column temperature on the enantiomeric separation were studied. The optimized chromatographic conditions were hexane-isopropyl alcohol (90 : 10, v/v) as the mobile phase with a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min and detection at the wavelength of 254 nm. The column temperature was set at 20 degrees C. The resolution of 3.3 for azelnidipine was achieved under the above chromatographic conditions. The method is simple, rapid and with good reproducibility.

A 76-year-old man developed fever and appetite loss, and then was referred to our hospital because of rapidly progressive renal insufficiency; his serum creatinine increased from 1.2 to 5.9 mg/dl within 1 month. On admission, his blood pressure was 166/92 mmHg, and laboratory findings showed signs of inflammation, anemia, proteinuria, and hematuria. Chest computed tomography (CT) suggested interstitial pneumonia, while a renal biopsy revealed that small arteries and arterioles were affected, and there was pauci-immune glomerulonephritis with cellular and fibrocellular crescents. In addition, an increased myeloperoxidase antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody titer confirmed microscopic polyangiitis. Treatment with oral prednisolone was initiated and seemed to successfully resolve the vasculitis activity. On the 11th day of admission, a calcium channel blocker, azelnidipine, was added to treat hypertension. Two days later, the patient developed abdominal distension, and abdominal CT showed massive ascites. The ascitic fluid was a milky white transudate with a normal leukocyte count. Neither clinical manifestations nor laboratory findings suggestive of liver cirrhosis, malignancy, infectious peritonitis, or bowel perforation were observed. On the 18th day of admission, azelnidipine was discontinued in view of reports of calcium channel blocker-induced chyloperitoneum in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis. Immediately, the abdominal distension disappeared, and the ascites appeared to decrease. Azelnidipine appears to have been responsible for the chyloperitoneum. Since a few cases of secondary vasculitis developing chyloperitoneum have been previously reported, vasculitis may have played a role in the development of chyloperitoneum.

(-)-Epigallocatechin gallate, Abafungin, ACE-031, Adapalene/benzoyl peroxide, AE-37, Aflibercept, AGS-003, Albiglutide, Alemtuzumab, Aliskiren fumarate, ALT-801, AN-2728, Anacetrapib, API, Aprepitant, ARQ-197, Ascorbic acid, Atazanavir sulfate, ATN-224, AVI-4658, Azacitidine, Azelnidipine; Belinostat, Bevacizumab, BI-2536, Biphasic insulin aspart, Bortezomib, Bovine lactoferrin, Bryostatin 1, Budesonide/formoterol fumarate; cAC10, Canfosfamide hydrochloride, Cediranib, Clofarabine, Cocaine conjugate vaccine; Darbepoetin alfa, Dasatinib, Denosumab, Disomotide, Doripenem, Dovitinib Lactate, Dronedarone hydrochloride, Drospirenone/estradiol, Dutasteride; Ecogramostim, Entinostat, Enzastaurin hydrochloride, Erlotinib hydrochloride, Everolimus, Exenatide, Ezetimibe, Ezetimibe/simvastatin; Fampridine, Fenretinide LXS, FFR-factor VIIa, Fingolimod hydrochloride, Frovatriptan; Gefitinib, Gimatecan, GP-2/GM-CSF; Iloperidone, Imatinib mesylate, Indibulin, Ipilimumab, Ivabradine hydrochloride; Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lapatinib ditosylate, LC-07, Lenalidomide, Linifanib, Liposomal doxorubicin, Liposomal vincristine, Litenimod, Lutein; M-118, MDX-1401, MEDI-528, Midostaurin, Miglustat, MK-0657; Natalizumab, Nesiritide, NGR-TNF, Niacin/simvastatin; Obatoclax mesylate, Olaparib, Omacetaxine mepesuccinate; Paclitaxel nanoparticles, Paclitaxel-eluting stent, Palonosetron hydrochloride, Pazopanib hydrochloride, Pegfilgrastim, Pemetrexed disodium, PER.C-flu, Perifosine, PF-02341066, Pimecrolimus, Pitrakinra, Plerixafor hydrochloride, Posaconazole; Rasburicase, Recombinant human relaxin H2, ReoT3D, Retaspimycin hydrochloride, Riferminogene pecaplasmid, Rindopepimut, Romiplostim, Ronacaleret hydrochloride, Rosuvastatin calcium, Rotigotine; Sagopilone, sALP-FcD10, SAR-245409, SCH-697243, Selumetinib, Sirolimus-eluting stent, SIR-Spheres, Sitagliptin phosphate monohydrate, Sitaxentan sodium, Sorafenib, Sunitinib malate; Tadalafil, Tandutinib, Tasimelteon, Temsirolimus, Teriparatide, Tiotropium bromide, TIV, Trabectedin, Tremelimumab, TRU-016; Vadimezan, Val8-GLP-1(7-37)OH, Vandetanib, Vernakalant hydrochloride, Voreloxin, Voriconazole, Vorinostat, Yttrium 90 (90Y) ibritumomab tiuxetan; Zeaxanthin, Ziprasidone hydrochloride, Zosuquidar trihydrochloride.

Accumulating evidence suggests that inflammation as well as oxidative stress play essential roles in atherogenesis, progression of atherosclerosis, and plaque instability and rupture. Recent studies on available anti-hypertensive agents have focused on their anti-atherosclerotic effects over and above their blood pressure lowering action. These studies have included investigations on several types of calcium channel blockers, with several investigations indicating that a dihydropiridine-based calcium channel blocker, azelnidipine, developed in Japan, has unique anti-oxidative properties. An anti-inflammatory effect of azelnidipine has, however, yet to be established and therefore we carried out a series of in vivo and in vitro studies to investigate this possibility. This was achieved by measuring inflammatory and oxidative stress markers in 16 high risk hypertensive patients administered 16mg/day of azelnidipine. After 4 weeks of treatment, serum levels of hsCRP, IL-6, and IL-8 and urinary 8-OHdG were decreased significantly, despite blood pressure remaining unchanged. Cultures of human mononuclear leukocytes collected from six healthy volunteers showed 100 nM of azelnidipine caused significant inhibition of formyl-methyonyl leucyl phenylalanine (fMLP)-induced production of IL-8. Taken together, these results suggest that azelnidipine has anti-inflammatory effects independent of its anti-hypertensive action. As leukocytes do not possess voltage-operated calcium channels, the effect of azelnidipine in these cells appears to occur independently of an L-type calcium channel antagonizing effect.

Objective In hypertensive patients, primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most prevalent type of secondary hypertension, and screening for PA has become very important. Calcium channel blockers (CCB) are widely used to treat hypertension, but most CCBs stimulate plasma renin activity (PRA) and increase plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC), both of which are used in the screening for PA. The aim of this study was to determine whether the newly introduced CCB, azelnidipine, affects PRA and PAC. Methods 40 hypertensive patients were treated with 16 mg of azelnidipine for 4 weeks. Results Azelnidipine treatment in drug-naïve (DN) cases significantly decreased systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and heart rate (HR). PRA and PAC in the DN group on azelnidipine treatment were indistinguishable from those in the DN group before treatment. Compared with other CCB treatments such as amlodipine, manidipine and slow-release nifedipine, azelnidipine showed comparable or significant reductions in SBP, DBP and HR. In patients who were switched from other CCBs to azelnidipine, PRA and PAC were decreased, except for PAC on amlodipine treatment. Since the PRA reduction rate exceeded that of PAC, the aldosterone/renin ratio (ARR) was significantly increased in those on azelnidipine treatment who had been switched from manidipine or nifedipine treatment, suggesting the restoration of possibly underestimated ARR values. Conclusion These data indicate that azelnidipine does not affect PRA or PAC, suggesting that azelnidipine could be a useful antihypertensive CCB while undergoing PA screening.

Aldosterone-induced activation of mineralocorticoid receptor, a member of the nuclear receptor family, results in increased tissue damage such as vascular inflammation and cardiac and perivascular fibrosis. Benidipine, a long-lasting dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, is used for hypertension and angina. Benidipine exhibits pleiotropic pharmacological features such as renoprotective and cardioprotective effects through triple blockade of L-, N-, and T-type calcium channels. However, the mechanism of additional beneficial effects on end-organ damage is poorly understood. Here, we examined the effects of benidipine and other calcium channel blockers on aldosterone-induced mineralocorticoid receptor activation using luciferase reporter assay system. Benidipine showed more potent activity than efonidipine, amlodipine, or azelnidipine. Benidipine depressed the response to higher concentrations of aldosterone, whereas pretreatment of eplerenone, a steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, did not. Binding studies using [(3)H] aldosterone indicated that benidipine and other calcium channel blockers competed for binding to mineralocorticoid receptor. Benidipine and other calcium channel blockers showed antagonistic activity on Ser810 to Leu mutant mineralocorticoid receptor, which is identified in patients with early-onset hypertension. On the other hand, eplerenone partially activated the mutant. Results of analysis using optical isomers of benidipine indicated that inhibitory effect of aldosterone-induced mineralocorticoid receptor activation was independent of its primary blockade of calcium channels. These results suggested that benidipine directly inhibits aldosterone-induced mineralocorticoid receptor activation, and the antagonistic activity might contribute to the drug's pleiotropic pharmacological features.

INTRODUCTION:: The optimal combination treatment for hypertension has not been established. We investigated the effect of a calcium channel blocker or a diuretic added to angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) on the augmentation index (AI), as a marker of arterial stiffness and wave reflection, in hypertensive patients. METHODS:: Thirty-seven patients treated with ARBs were randomly allocated to either of the 2 groups receiving an ARB plus azelnidipine (AZ group) or trichlormethiazide (TCM group). Changes in brachial blood pressure (BP), AI, high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP), and serum asymmetric dimethylarginine, as an endogenous nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, were determined. RESULTS:: Systolic and diastolic blood pressure after 6 months were significantly reduced in both the groups similarly; however, after adjustment for baseline covariates, the extent of the reduction in AI (%) in the AZ group was significantly greater than in the TCM group (between-group difference was 3.2; 95%CI: 0.2-6.3; P = 0.03). The reduction of high-sensitive C-reactive protein (mg/L) and serum asymmetric dimethylarginine (mumol/L) was significantly greater in the AZ group than in the TCM group (between-group difference was 0.18 and 0.05; 95%CI: -0.01 to 0.36 and -0.01 to 0.11; P = 0.04 and 0.02, respectively). Further, when patients were analyzed according to age younger than 60 years or older than 60 years, the reduction in AI in the AZ group aged older than 60 years was significantly greater than in the TCM group. CONCLUSION:: The results suggest that azelnidipine has a more beneficial effect on vascular properties in combination therapy with ARB than trichlormethiazide.

Background: The endothelium modulates vascular tone by synthesizing and releasing several vasodilating factors, including vasodilator prostaglandins, nitric oxide (NO) and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF). In the present study, we examined whether an angiotensin-receptor blocker, a calcium-channel blocker or their combination improved EDHF-mediated responses in diabetic apolipoprotein E-deficient (ApoE(-/-)) mice. Methods and Results: We used male C57BL/6N (control) and streptozocin-induced diabetic ApoE(-/-) mice. The diabetic ApoE(-/-) mice were administered oral vehicle (untreated), olmesartan (OLM, 30 mg.kg(-1).day(-1)), azelnidipine (AZL, 10 mg.kg(-1).day(-1)), their combination (OLM + AZL), or hydralazine (HYD 5 mg.kg(-1).day(-1)) for 5 weeks. In the untreated group, systolic blood pressure was significantly higher and both EDHF-mediated relaxation and endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization were markedly reduced as compared with the control group. Although EDHF-mediated relaxation was not significantly improved in the HYD, OLM and AZL groups, it was significantly improved in the OLM + AZL group, as was also the case with phosphorylation of Akt and endothelial NO synthase (eNOS). In contrast, the endothelium-independent relaxation response to sodium nitroprusside or NS-1619 (a direct opener of K(Ca) channels) was unaltered in any group. Conclusions: OLM + AZL may improve the severely impaired EDHF-mediated responses in diabetic ApoE(-/-) mice, in which activation of the endothelial Akt - eNOS pathway may be involved.

The study aim was to examine the effect of combination therapy comprising angiotensin receptor blocker plus calcium antagonist on post-treatment plasma adiponectin levels compared to pretreatment levels. There was a significant gender difference in the relationship between preadiponectin level and age. In the search for contributing factors for treatment-based changes in adiponectin levels, these effects of gender and age were considered in statistical analysis. The adiponectin level in the combination therapy group was further increased compared to that in each of the monotherapy groups, despite there being no significant difference in antihypertensive effect, indicating that the combined medication provided an effect beyond that of lowering blood pressure.

We investigated the changes of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) -9 in the peripheral blood samples of patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), and the effect of azelnidipine on plasma MMP-9 levels in those patients. Levels of MMP-9 were measured in 22 patients who underwent EVAR for AAAs, and results were compared between a group receiving 16 mg azelnidipine daily (n=12) and a control group without azelnidipine (n=10). Measurements were taken preoperatively, and at 1 month and 3 months, postoperatively. Patients without endoleaks after EVAR showed a significant decrease in mean plasma MMP-9 levels (preoperative value: 39.5+/-14.3 ng/mL, after 1 month: 25.0+/-12.6, after 3 months: 28.2+/-10.2 ng/mL; P=0.004). In contrast, no significant decreases in mean plasma MMP-9 levels were observed in the patients with endoleaks after EVAR (preoperative value: 37.5+/-9.0 ng/mL, after 1 month: 26.8+/-8.4, after 3 months: 38.5+/-15.7 ng/mL; P=0.219). Moreover, among patients without endoleaks, those receiving azelnidipine showed a significantly greater decrease in the mean plasma MMP-9 levels for 3 months postoperatively (preoperative value: 47.7+/-13.2 ng/mL, after 1 month: 26.6+/-12.8, after 3 months: 26.1+/-11.4 ng/mL; P0.001) compared with the control group without endoleaks (preoperative value: 31.3+/-10.5 ng/mL, after 1 month: 33.4+/-12.1, after 3 months: 30.3+/-9.1 ng/mL; P=0.792). These results showed that azelnidipine treatment in patients without endoleak after EVAR was associated with a significant decrease in mean plasma MMP-9 levels for 3 months postoperatively.

Calcium channel blockers are widely used for the treatment of hypertension. Although they are effective for their strong vasodilator action, there are concerns regarding related baroreflex-mediated activation of sympathetic nervous system. However, long-acting calcium channel blockers, such as amlodipine, are now known safe for the treatment of hypertension. Furthermore, the new type of calcium channel blockers, such as cilnidipine with N-type calcium channel blocking action, or azelnidipine that has sympatho-inhibitory action with anti-oxidant effect, provide a new insight for the future use of calcium channel blockers.

Text book in all medical school showed that the baroreflex system is one of the most important regulatory systems. When blood pressure increases, heart rate decrease and an artery is dilated with the baroreflex system. By decrease of cardiac output and arterial resistances, blood pressure returns to the normal value. However, there is no diagnostic method, which can measure the sensitivity of a baroreflex system of the artery by the simple methodology. We had challenged invention of the new machine, which could diagnose the sensitivity of the baroreflex system of not only a heart, but also an artery. In this system, the measurement sections are only an electrocardiography (ECG) and peripheral pulse wave. These time series is inputted into a personal computer system, and analyzed quantitatively. Responses of the artery were measured with pulse wave velocity (PWV) calculated from pulse wave transmission time from heart to an artery. In this system, the heart rate change corresponding to the blood-pressure change in time series sequence is observed. Delay time was measured by the cross correlation function. Slope of the blood pressure (BP) change and heart rate (HR) change showed the sensitivity of the baroreflex system of heart. Furthermore, this system can measure the sensitivity of the baroreflex system of an artery. Change of PWV in response to the BP change was observed. We found that significant correlation was observed in the time sequence between BP change and PWV change after delay time calculated from cross correlation. Clinical research was started through allowance of the Ethics Committee. Decreased sensibility in the hypertensive patient's baroreflex system was observed as a result of the clinical research. Furthermore, alteration of the baroreflex sensitivity before and after the drug administration was evaluated. For example, Azelnidipine, Calcium antagonists improved the baroreflex sensitivity of the artery in several cases. This system may be useful f- or the follow up of the hypertensive patients.

AAV1/SERCA2a, Abacavir sulfate/lamivudine, Adalimumab, Aliskiren fumarate, Ambrisentan, Aripiprazole, AT-7519, Atazanavir sulfate, Atomoxetine hydrochloride, Azacitidine, Azelnidipine; Besifloxacin hydrochloride, Bevacizumab, Bioabsorbable everolimus-eluting coronary stent, Bortezomib, Bosentan, Budesonide/formoterol fumarate; CAIV-T, Carisbamate, Casopitant mesylate, Certolizumab pegol, Cetuximab, Ciclesonide, Ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone, CTCE-9908; Dalcetrapib, Darunavir, Deferasirox, Desloratadine, Disitertide, Drotrecogin alfa (activated), DTA-H19, Duloxetine hydrochloride, Dutasteride; Ecogramostim, Efalizumab, Emtricitabine, Eribulin mesilate, Escitalopram oxalate, Eszopiclone, EUR-1008, Everolimus-eluting coronary stent, Exenatide; Fampridine, Fluticasone furoate, Formoterol fumarate/fluticasone propionate, Fosamprenavir calcium, Fulvestrant; Gabapentin enacarbil, GS-7904L; HPV-6/11/16/18, Human Secretin, Hydralazine hydrochloride/isosorbide dinitrate; Imatinib mesylate, Imexon, Inalimarev/Falimarev, Indacaterol, Indacaterol maleate, Inhalable human insulin, Insulin detemir, Insulin glargine, Ixabepilone; L-Alanosine, Lapatinib ditosylate, Lenalidomide, Levocetirizine dihydrochloride, Liraglutide, Lisdexamfetamine mesilate, Lopinavir, Loratadine/montelukast sodium, Lutropin alfa; MeNZB, Mepolizumab, Micafungin sodium, Morphine hydrochloride; Nabiximols, Nikkomycin Z; Olmesartan medoxomil, Omalizumab; Paclitaxel-eluting stent, Pegfilgrastim, Peginterferon alfa-2a, Peginterferon alfa-2b, Perifosine, PF-489791, Plitidepsin, Posaconazole, Pregabalin; QAX-576; Raltegravir potassium, Ramelteon, Rasagiline mesilate, Recombinant human relaxin H2, rhGAD65, Rivaroxaban, Rosuvastatin calcium, Rotigotine; Saxagliptin, SCH-530348, Sirolimus-eluting stent, SLIT-amikacin, Sorafenib, Sotrastaurin, SR-16234, Sulforaphane; Tadalafil, Tanespimycin, Tapentadol hydrochloride, Teriparatide, Tesofensine, Tiotropium bromide, Tipifarnib, Tirapazamine, TMC-207, Tocilizumab, Tolvaptan, Tosedostat, Treprostinil sodium; Ustekinumab; Varespladib methyl, Vicriviroc, Vildagliptin, Vildagliptin/metformin hydrochloride, Volociximab, Voriconazole; Ziconotide, Ziprasidone hydrochloride.

Azelnidipine is a new dihydropyridine Ca(2+) channel blocker with long plasma half-life. To understand the in vivo cardiovascular profile of azelnidipine, it was assessed in the halothane-anaesthetized, closed-chest canine model and compared with the effect of amlodipine. We administered azelnidipine in doses of 10, 20 and 70 mug/kg, i.v. or amlodipine in doses of 30, 70 and 200 mug/kg, i.v. cumulatively to the animals. The hypotensive effects of azelnidipine and amlodipine were slow in onset and long-lasted, while their extents of dose-related hypotensive effects were similar. Azelnidipine hardly affected the heart rate or plasma noradrenaline concentration at any doses, whereas the high dose of amlodipine increased these parameters. Azelnidipine as well as amlodipine tended to increase the ventricular contraction, which did not achieve statistical significance. During autonomic receptor blockade with atropine and propranolol, neither drug affected the heart rate, ventricular contraction or plasma noradrenaline concentration, although a more significant hypotensive action was observed. These results indicate that azelnidipine and amlodipine do not directly affect cardiac function. Amlodipine may induce sinus tachycardia via reflex-mediated increase in sympathetic tone. Such lack of reflex tachycardia with azelnidipine will provide potential therapeutic strategy for treatment of patients with cardiovascular diseases, being more beneficial than amlodipine.

Azelnidipine, a long-acting calcium channel blocker, is highly lipid soluble and selective for the vascular wall, and is expected to have an increasing effect on cerebral blood flow (CBF). The aim of this study is to investigate its safety and efficacy in stroke patients in the chronic stage as far as CBF is concerned using N-isopropyl-p-(123)I-iodo amphetamine ((123)I-IMP) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). The patients were orally administered 8 or 16 mg of azelnidipine. Regional CBF was evaluated by (123)I-IMP SPECT using three-dimensional stereotactic region-of-interest (ROI) template (3D-SRT), a technique using anatomical standardization and ROI template consisting of 636 ROIs for the whole brain. Mean hemispheric CBF was defined as the mean value of the corpus callosum, and the precentral, central, parietal, angular and temporal gyri. Mean hemispheric and regional CBF after 1, 3 and 6 months were analyzed using a one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance. Ten post-ischemic stroke patients with hypertension were enrolled between October 2005 and October 2007, and all of them were well controlled with normal blood pressure (before: 172.3+/-16.6/88.4+/-14.0 mm Hg; 6 months: 128.7+/-15.9/70.9+/-10.1 mm Hg). No vascular events were observed during the study period. The mean hemispheric CBF was maintained during the study period (before: 46.0+/-9.7 ml per 100 g per min; 6 months: 49.3+/-11.1 ml per 100 g per min). The regional CBF was also maintained. In the chronic stage of ischemic stroke, azelnidipine could safely decrease systemic blood pressure without decreasing CBF.Hypertension Research advance online publication, 30 October 2009; doi:10.1038/hr.2009.179.

A 12-week randomized, double-blind, four-arm parallel-group, comparative study was conducted in patients with essential hypertension to evaluate the antihypertensive effect and safety of combination therapy with olmesartan medoxomil (OLM, an angiotensin-receptor blocker) 20 mg plus azelnidipine (AZL, a long-acting dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker) 16 mg, (O/A (20/16)), or OLM 10 mg/AZL 8 mg (O/A (10/8)) compared with those of monotherapy with OLM 20 mg (OLM (20)) or AZL 16 mg (AZL (16)). The change from baseline to week 12 in seated blood pressure (SeBP) was -23.6/-14.2 mm Hg (systolic/diastolic BP) in the O/A (20/16) group, and -20.3/-13.0 mm Hg in the O/A (10/8) group, which was a significantly greater reduction in SeBP than in the monotherapy groups (-15.7/-9.9 mm Hg in OLM (20); -15.0/-9.4 mm Hg in AZL (16)). The change from baseline in 24-h ambulatory BP was also significantly greater in the O/A (20/16) and O/A (10/8) combination groups (-22.1/-13.5 and -18.2/-10.6 mm Hg, respectively) than in the OLM (20) and AZL (16) monotherapy groups (-12.1/-6.9 and -12.0/-6.9 mm Hg). The proportion of patients achieving the SeBP goal (<130/85 mm Hg for normal BP or <140/90 mm Hg for high-normal BP) was significantly higher in the O/A (20/16) combination group than in the monotherapy groups. The incidence of adverse events was similar in the O/A combination groups and the monotherapy groups. These results showed that combination therapy with O/A was well tolerated and exerted a stronger antihypertensive effect compared with monotherapy with OLM or AZL in patients with essential hypertension.Hypertension Research advance online publication, 9 October 2009; doi:10.1038/hr.2009.163.

PURPOSE: Many trials have shown that calcium channel blockers (CCBs) can reduce the cardiovascular (CV) events in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). The mechanisms of this effect could be associated with plaque regression due to the anti-atherosclerotic properties of CCBs. The goal of this study is to determine the effects of CCB on volumetric quantitative changes of coronary plaques accessed by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). To confirm this hypothesis, a multicenter randomized trial of CCBs treatment with azelnidipine or amlodipine will be conducted in hypertensive CAD patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients who have hypertension and are scheduled for PCI will be enrolled. Subjects will be randomized to azelnidipine or amlodipine and observed for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint will be the percent change of coronary plaque volume. The secondary endpoint will include inflammatory markers, antioxidant activity, and incidence of composite cardiovascular events. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we will investigate the improvement of coronary plaque with IVUS by treatment with two dihydropyridine CCBs in hypertensive patients undergoing elective PCI. This result will lead to the discovery of more effective drug therapy for inhibition of coronary events.

BACKGROUND: Some reports have discussed the synergic effects of angiotensin II receptor blockers and calcium channel blockers on vascular injury or microalbuminuria. The present study examined the effects of combination treatment with olmesartan and azelnidipine on polycystic kidney disease in a mouse model (DBA/2-FG pcy mouse) and its mechanisms. METHODS: The mice were divided into the following groups: combination treatment (n = 21), olmesartan treatment alone (n = 23), azelnidipine treatment alone (n = 29) or untreated (n = 26). Mean blood pressure and kidney weight were measured at 4 and 8 weeks after the treatment. Renal expression of angiotensin II, gp91, nitrotyrosine and endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) were examined by immunostaining. In addition, extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation was evaluated by Western blotting. RESULTS: Olmesartan decreased the numbers of angiotensin II and gp91-positive cells, mainly macrophages, and cyst size at 4 weeks. However, only combination treatment suppressed cell infiltration, extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation and interstitial fibrosis with a significant change in the kidney weight/body weight ratio. The azelnidipine and combination treatment increased the numbers of interstitial eNOS-positive cells. CONCLUSION: The combination treatment protects against cyst enlargement in polycystic kidney disease by suppressing interstitial inflammation, fibrosis and oxidative stress by upregulating eNOS expression during disease course.